Sunday, March 11, 2012

Pretty picture: Baptistonia echinata


If everything went according to plan yesterday,1 I now have about a million orchid photos to sort / crop / color-tweak, a task which could probably occupy me for the next eleven years or so. I only actually have two weeks before I run out of last year's pictures, though, so I'll have to go a little faster than that.


Meanwhile, this week, we have Baptistonia echinata, yet another in the very, very long line of plants that were mis-tagged: the tag said "Baptistonia echinacea," not B. echinata. I understand that it's easy to mis-write an uncommon word if there's a much more common, similar word already in your brain, but even so: does no one know how to proofread anymore? I was also disappointed because my first impulse was to hope that someone had named a species of Echinacea E. baptistonia, so as to confuse search engines, but alas.2


Couldn't find much specific information about B. echinata on-line. It's from Brazil, it's epiphytic, they like lots of humidity but are fairly temperature- and shade-tolerant; if I understand this post correctly, it's the only species in Baptistonia.

-


1 (I'm writing this on Wednesday the 7th.)
2 Possibly no big loss: all available evidence suggests that search engines would cope just fine, it's people who would constantly be mixing them up.


3 comments:

Pat said...

The Plant List suggests that even this one is not in the genus Baptistonia but is Oncidium brunleesianum.

mr_subjunctive said...

Pat:

Don't know where they're getting that from: it doesn't look onciddy at all to me. . . .

houseplantguru said...

I have one of these and actually got it to bloom again! Yeah! Don't know how I did, but I was extremely excited. It was, of course, much smaller than when I bought it, but it bloomed. Works for me.