Showing posts with label Gymnocalycium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gymnocalycium. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Rumble Among the Jungle, Matches 1.25-1.28

Rules and Stuff
1) It's probably possible to vote more than once per poll, but please don't. If I believe that someone is voting repeatedly, I will throw out those results, repost the poll, and seriously question that person's priorities.
2) If you want to link to a poll on Twitter / Facebook / your blog / whatever and encourage your friends to come and pump up the support for your favorite plants, you are encouraged to do so.
3) You are also encouraged to leave comments on Rumble posts, if so moved.
4) All photos will enlarge if opened in a separate window/tab.
5) You can choose which plant is "best" according to whatever criteria you decide for yourself. My personal process is a bit convoluted.1
6) All polls will be open for three days.


Match results, 1.9-1.12
In match 1.9, Dracaena reflexa cvv. walloped Hylocereus/Gymnocalycium grafts by the staggering margin of 80 to 24. This is not altogether surprising, though it does mean that RATJ voters are probably not a representative sample of the plant-buying public, since the public can't seem to get enough of them.
In the less-dramatic match 1.10, Asparagus spp. were victorious over Cissus rhombifolia cvv. by the respectable 62 to 34. I'd figured it would be closer than that.

Dracaena reflexa cvv. and Asparagus spp. will go up against one another on October 8, in match 2.5.

Match 1.11 had me mildly terrified before it went up, just because at that point many of my picks weren't doing well, and I very much did not want to see poinsettias beat Chinese evergreens. I needn't have worried, as it turned out -- Aglaonema cvv. delivered Euphorbia pulcherrima the Christmas present of a hard-core ass-kicking, with a score of 82 to 21. That's the most one-sided any match has been so far, though match 1.18 (Monstera deliciosa vs. Musa/Ensete cvv.) is running 85%-15% in favor of Monstera as I write this, and I'll be surprised if today's match 1.28, down the page here, doesn't wind up being even more lopsided than that.
In match 1.12, Oxalis triangularis cvv. narrowly edged out Jasminum spp., 57 to 45. I voted for Oxalis, but figured I'd be the only one to do so, and am completely at a loss to explain what the hell happened there. I thought everybody loved jasmine.

So, Aglaonema cvv. opposes Oxalis triangularis cvv. next, in match 2.6.

Now for today's matches:

Match 1.25
Stromanthe sanguinea cvv. vs. Platycerium spp. (staghorn fern)

Upper left and lower right: Stromanthe sanguinea 'Magicstar.'
Lower left and upper right: Stromanthe sanguinea 'Triostar.'


(Unidentified Platycerium spp.)






Match 1.26
Hypoestes phyllostachya cvv. (polka-dot plant) vs. Gynura aurantiaca (purple passion plant)

(Various unidentified Hypoestes phyllostachya cultivars.)


(All Gynura aurantiaca.)






Match 1.27
Aloe vera (medicinal aloe, burn plant) vs. Gymnocalycium spp.

(Top: young Aloe vera. Bottom: mature A. vera.)


(Top: Gymnocalycium NOID. Bottom: G. baldianum.)






Match 1.28
Dracaena surculosa (gold-dust dracaena) vs. Schlumbergera cvv. (holiday/Thanksgiving/Christmas cactus)

(Dracaena surculosa cv.)


Center and top left: Schlumbergera 'Caribbean Dancer;' others are NOID.






-

1 I'm deciding according to a hypothetical situation in which all of my houseplants are gone, as are all the other houseplants of the world, except for one producer/supplier/retailer. Said person is offering to restock me with one or the other of the plants in question but refuses to give me both. Which one would I choose?


Friday, September 23, 2011

Rumble Among the Jungle, Matches 1.9-1.12

Rules and Stuff
1) It's probably possible to vote more than once per poll, but please don't. If I believe that someone is voting repeatedly, I will throw out those results, repost the poll, and seriously question that person's priorities.
2) If you want to link to a poll on Twitter / Facebook / your blog / whatever and encourage your friends to come and pump up the support for your favorite plants, you are encouraged to do so.
3) You are also encouraged to leave comments on Rumble posts, if so moved.
4) All photos will enlarge if opened in a separate window/tab.
5) You can choose which plant is "best" according to whatever criteria you decide for yourself. My personal process is a bit convoluted.1
6) All polls will be open for three days.

Match 1.9
Dracaena reflexa cvv. vs. Hylocereus/Gymnocalycium grafts

Clockwise from top left: D. reflexa 'Riki,' 'Anita,' 'Song of India,' 'Song of Jamaica.'


(Assorted Gymnocalyciums grafted to Hylocereus.)






Match 1.10
Asparagus spp. (asparagus fern) vs. Cissus rhombifolia cvv. (oakleaf ivy, grape ivy)

Clockwise from top: Asparagus setaceus, A. densiflorus 'Myersii,' A. macowanii.


Top left and bottom right: Cissus rhombifolia. Top right and bottom left: C. rhombifolia 'Ellen Danica.'






Match 1.11
Euphorbia pulcherrima (poinsettia) vs. Aglaonema cvv. (Chinese evergreen)

(Various unidentified Euphorbia pulcherrima cvv.)


Clockwise from top left: Aglaonema 'Emerald Bay,' 'Brilliant,' 'Mystic Marble,' 'Sparkling Sarah.'






Match 1.12
Oxalis triangularis cvv. (shamrock) vs. Jasminum spp. (jasmine)

(All Oxalis triangularis NOIDs.)


(Both Jasminum sambac, because that's all I had pictures for.)






-

1 I'm deciding according to a hypothetical situation in which all of my houseplants are gone, as are all the other houseplants of the world, except for one producer/supplier/retailer. Said person is offering to restock me with one or the other of the plants in question but refuses to give me both. Which one would I choose?


Tuesday, July 12, 2011

List: Houseplants Which Have Pink Flowers

"Pink" is a tougher color to define than most, because it shades into a lot of other colors. Differentiating between "pink" and "lavender," "coral," or "red" can be tough sometimes. And then there are the problems with whether "fuchsia" is pink or purple or its own color entirely, and so on. You get the picture. Didn't have these sorts of problems with the yellow-flowers list or the orange-flowers list.1

As with previous lists like this, I'm looking at the plants from an interior-decorating perspective, not botany. So yes, I know that bracts aren't flowers, but I'm assuming that most people who find this page by Google search or whatever are looking for stuff that works visually, not scientifically.

Adenium obesum cvv. (only some varieties; most fall somewhere on the white-pink-red continuum, though)

Aechmea fasciata (the pink parts are the bracts; the actual flowers are blue-violet)

Cyclamen persicum cvv. (only some cvv.; white, red, lavender, striped, and two-tone flowers are also available)

Dracaena fragrans (seems to vary with culture; I've seen some photos that looked pink and others that looked white or cream-colored)

Euphorbia milii cvv. (The true flowers are yellow-green; the colored parts are bracts. Bracts may be white, yellow, red, or two-toned, though red and pink seem to be the most common)

Episcia cvv. (only some; red seems to be most common, but orange, coral, and yellow are also available)

Gymnocalycium baldianum and other spp. (most are white or very pale pink, though baldianum seems to be the exception)

Mandevilla cvv. (some; most are somewhere along the white-pink-red spectrum, with red being most common as far as I've seen)

Rhododendron cvv. (only some cvv.; most are in the neighborhood of white-pink-red, but lavender also happens. Plants sold for outdoor planting cover a much broader color range than those sold as tabletop plants, in my experience.)

Tradescantia sillamontana. (Always pink as far as I know.)


For recommends and anti-recommends, I've had positive experiences with five of the above (Aechmea, Cyclamen, Dracaena, Euphorbia, Episcia), bad personal experiences with two (Adenium, Tradescantia), bad professional experiences with two (Mandevilla, Rhododendron), and not much experience at all with one (Gymnocalycium).

Assuming that getting flowers out of the plant is important, my top recommendation would be Euphorbia milii: it does require a lot of light and regular fertilizer, but it's otherwise easy to bring into bloom, and a durable, forgiving plant.

Second recommendation would be Episcias. Since they don't all have pink flowers, it's important to be sure you know what you're getting, but once you have one, it should be fairly easy to keep going. (One does have to restart them regularly, but they produce plantlets on runners all the time, so restarting is mainly a matter of cutting off a plantlet and sticking it in a pot.)

Both the Aechmea and Dracaena are wonderful plants, but they don't bloom often, so I'll have to go with Tradescantia sillamontana as the third recommend, even though I've had bad luck with it personally. Again, it needs bright light to flower, and the individual flowers don't last long, but they're normally rugged plants (my experience notwithstanding), and in bright enough light the foliage will also turn pinkish.

For the anti-recommend, I'll go with Rhododendron. No doubt there's someone somewhere who keeps them going indoors for long periods, but the plants that are usually available for sale have been pushed hard to bloom, and consequently provide a very intense but brief show. At work, we mostly had trouble keeping them cool and wet enough. They'll defoliate dramatically if they get too dry, which is really easy to do in a container, and new growth is slow to come back on. They're pretty, but don't get attached.

Not pictured:
(If you know of other plants that would belong in this list, or believe that one of the ones I've included is here by mistake, leave me a comment.)
  • Abutilon cvv. (some)
  • Acalypha reptans (more of a pinkish-red than a true pink)
  • Aeschynanthus 'Thai Pink'
  • Aloinopsis sp. (some spp.? Very light pink or white)
  • Anacampseros rufescens (pinkish-purple)
  • Anthurium cvv. (some)
  • Ardisia elliptica (flowers infrequent indoors, and very pale pink)
  • Argyroderma spp. (some spp.; pinkish-purple)
  • Begonia cvv. (many, esp. cane-types and rhizomatous types, though not all bloom pink, and some are reluctant to bloom at all)
  • Bougainvillea cvv. (some; pinkish-purple)
  • Brugmansia cvv. (some)
  • Bryophyllum tubiflorum (coral-pk? I haven't seen the flowers in person, and Google image search was only somewhat helpful)
  • Calliandra emarginata (not sure it really counts as a houseplant, though)
  • orchids in the Cattleya alliance (some; they also have a tendency toward pinkish-purple, rather than true pink)
  • Ceropegia woodii (both pink and purple)
  • Chirita cvv./spp. including C. linearis (most Chiritas tend to be blue or purple, though)
  • Cleistocactus spp. (some? pinkish-orange)
  • Clerodendrum x speciosum. (the actual flowers are red, but the bracts are pinkish-red)
  • Codiaeum variegatum (rarely: usually flowers are white, but sometimes they're light pink. The flowers aren't particularly ornamental either way.)
  • Cordyline fruticosa (also not hugely ornamental, but the flowers are pink)
  • Crassula alpestris (very light pink)
  • Crassula 'Buddha's Temple'
  • Crassula coccinea
  • Crassula ovata (barely; mostly white, with only a hint of pink)
  • Crassula rupestris (sometimes?)
  • Crassula sarcocaulis
  • Cymbidium cvv. (some cvv.)
  • Dendrobium cvv. (some; usually more lavender or pink-purple than straight pink)
  • Echeveria cvv. (some; flowers are often pink or pink-orange with a yellow "mouth")
  • Echinocereus cvv. (some; those that are pinkish tend to lean to the purple/lavender side)
  • Echinopsis cvv. (some; usually either white or very light pink)
  • Epiphyllum cvv. (few; most of what's available appear to be white, but there are red and red-pink varieties out there)
  • Euphorbia pulcherrima (some; bracts; true flowers are yellowish-green)
  • Ferocactus spp. (few; pinkish-purple or pinkish-red)
  • Fuchsia cvv. (most; reddish-pink)
  • Gasteria cvv. (few; pinkish-orange)
  • Gerbera cvv. (some, though I wouldn't necessarily call it suitable as a houseplant)
  • Guzmania cvv. (a few varieties have hot pink or pinkish-purple bracts)
  • Hatiora cvv. (the ones called "Easter Cactus," and not all of them. These were formerly called Rhipsalis or Rhipsalidopsis.)
  • Heliconia cvv. (bracts on a few varieties are pink; usually bracts are red and/or yellow)
  • Hibiscus rosa-sinensis (only some varieties)
  • Hippeastrum cvv. (some varieties)
  • Hoya archboldiana (pink and white)
  • Hoya bella (most of the flower is white, but some is pink)
  • Hoya carnosa (usually pink and red but variable)
  • Hoya compacta
  • Hoya darwinii (light pink)
  • Hoya davidcummingii (pink and yellow)
  • Hoya globulifera
  • Hoya megalaster (dark pink)
  • Hoya obovata (dark pink and light pink)
  • Hoya pubicalyx (variable; flowers are some combination of pinkish-red, dark pink, pale pink, and white)
  • Hoya purpureo-fusca (pink and yellow)
  • Hoya rubida (dark pink)
  • Hydrangea cvv. (sometimes; I wouldn't call it a houseplant, but some people do.)
  • Hypoestes phyllostachya (pinkish-purple)
  • Impatiens cvv. (some varieties)
  • Jasminum spp.? (occasionally, some of the Jasminums we had at work would produce blooms with a slight pinkish tinge to them, but I don't know if that was cultural or a particular variety or what)
  • Justicia carnea (maybe not a great houseplant, but flowers are vivid pinkish-red)
  • Justicia scheidweileri (the bracts are hot pink; true flowers are purple)
  • Kalanchoe blossfeldiana (some varieties)
  • Kalanchoe eriophylla (variable; some white or lavender)
  • Kohleria cvv. (some varieties, though usually Kohleria flowers are red, orange, or purple)
  • Lampranthus blandus (after trying it myself, I'm not convinced that this should count as a houseplant, but the flowers -- which I've never seen in person -- are pinkish-purple)
  • Mammillaria spp./cvv. (some varieties are pinkish-purple or dark pink; others flower white)
  • Medinilla cvv. (most are pink; lavender and orange also exist)
  • Melocactus spp. (most; hot pink)
  • Mimosa pudica (arguably more lavender than pink, but sometimes they photograph as pink)
  • Miltoniopsis cvv. (most have some pink somewhere, usually dark pink)
  • Musa cvv. (few; bracts)
  • Nematanthus cvv. (few; pinkish-orange or pinkish-red)
  • Neoregelia cvv. (actual flowers are violet-blue, but in some varieties, the leaves at the center of the plant flush hot pink when flowering begins)
  • Nerium oleander (some; maybe not really a houseplant, though)
  • orchids in the Oncidium alliance (some, though it's not the most common color)
  • Opuntia spp. (few; most are yellow)
  • Oxalis triangularis (variable between pink, white, and lavender)
  • Pachypodium spp. (few; most flower yellow or white)
  • Paphiopedilum cvv. (few I'd call true pink; most are white/purple/yellow/brown, but some have smudgy pink areas between white/violet)
  • Parodia cvv.? (most are yellow, orange or red)
  • Passiflora cv. 'Banana' (maybe other cvv.?)
  • Pelargonium cvv. (some)
  • Pereskia grandifolia (flowers pinkish-violet, though other Pereskias don't; may or may not be suitable as houseplant)
  • Phalaenopsis cvv. (some; more pink-purple than true pink)
  • Phragmipedium cvv. (a few)
  • Pilea mollis 'Moon Valley'
  • Pilosocereus leucocephalus, P. palmeri (pale pink)
  • Pinguicula spp. (a few; most are purple, lavender, or blue-violet)
  • Pleiospilos nelii (most Pleiospilos flowers are yellow/orange)
  • Plumeria cvv. (a few; arguably not a houseplant)
  • Portulacaria afra (I was surprised too.)
  • Ruellia makoyana (pinkish-purple; have never seen it grown indoors but I'm told people sometimes do)
  • Saintpaulia cvv. (some)
  • Saxifraga stolonifera (barely: mostly the flowers are white and yellow)
  • Schlumbergera cvv. (few, more pinkish-purple or pink-orange than straight pink)
  • Sedum burrito (uncertain; there weren't many photos, but the flowers sure looked like a dark pink-purple)
  • Sempervivum cvv. (most/all?)
  • Sinningia cvv. (few)
  • Spathoglottis cvv. (some)
  • Stenocereus thurberi
  • Streptocarpus cvv. (few; most seem to be white, lavender, purple, or blue)
  • Stromanthe sanguinea (dk pk to red; not especially attractive but they still count)
  • Tillandsia cvv. (air plants) (I've seen at least one with pink bracts and lavender flowers)
  • Tillandsia cyanea (hot pink bracts, blue-violet true flowers)
  • Tolmiea menziesii (not ornamental; small and sort of a weird pink-brown color)
  • Tradescantia pallida
  • Tradescantia zebrina (usually)
  • Vanda cvv. (some, pink or pink-purple)
  • Zantedeschia cvv. (some; spathes)
  • Zingiber malaysianum (bracts vary in color from yel to pk, though blooming is unlikely indoors)
-

1 The color I will really hate doing is white: I won't have any trouble finding pictures, but the list of houseplants with white flowers is going to be huge.


Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Random plant event: Gymnocalycium scion color reversion

The ex-job got another batch of grafted cacti a little while ago. They're all Hylocereus stock with lurid mutant Gymnocalycium scions (The stock is the base, the scion is the top. I kind of knew this already, but I think I only really got the vocabulary down as of yesterday.), and mostly I'm just kind of meh, whatever about grafted plants in general, but there was one in this batch that was a little bit interesting, because the scion had remembered how to make chlorophyll again.


So it appeared, anyway.

This is probably something the producers of these monstrosities (have I mentioned I don't like grafted plants?) try very hard to avoid, because the whole point of these is to try to get people to buy something they think is a huge, vividly-colored flower, and if it's reverting then the scion on this plant is going to be plain, boring green eventually. But grafts between two green cacti are much more likely to survive for a long time than a graft between one chlorophyll-producing plant and another plant that doesn't: this guy would actually be the better long-term investment.


Additionally, the plants with purple Gymnocalycium scions (which can and do produce chlorophyll) sometimes go on to form an actual flower (photos here), while still attached to the stock. Presumably our revert here will also do so eventually. Which is another reason why this particular plant, sort of ugly though it might be, would be a better investment than one of the grafts with the screaming yellow, red or pink scions on the same table.


Monday, July 7, 2008

Random plant event: Gymnocalycium graft blooming

I suppose this probably happens all the time, but I'd never seen it until the last month or so: grafted Gymnocalycium cacti can bloom. I've only rarely seen the non-grafted ones flower, so this was kind of doubly cool for me.


Or even triply cool: all the plants with purple grafts (but none of the other ones) were setting buds, but until last Monday, they always sold right before I got to see the flowers open. (Sometimes it works like that.) So it was nice to get the chance to see it at all. That it also happened to be pretty is a bonus.


I'm still not a fan of grafted cacti, and I still feel like the Hylocereus are getting screwed in the deal, but this was still pretty neat.


Friday, January 18, 2008

Unsung Hero (Hylocereus undatus)

Pity poor Hylocereus undatus.1 Though a perfectly interesting species in its own right, you'll never see it when you're looking over the plants at your local Lowe's or supermarket or garden center or wherever you buy them, even if you're looking directly at it. Why's that? Because 99.99% of the time, you're seeing this:



These brightly-colored cacti are actually two different species of cacti grafted together. The top plant in these photos is a Gymnocalycium species, often called "moon cactus," which has mutated in such a way that it is unable (or maybe just unwilling: they seem kind of spoiled if you ask me) to produce the chlorophyll it needs to photosynthesize. These have been around for years: I remember seeing them as a little kid. The ones I remember, though, were always kind of a neon red: the pinks and yellows and oranges and purples like in the picture are a semi-new development.

The Gymnocalycium produces offsets pretty easily, even when grafted, and the offsets so produced can be grafted to a new base, perpetuating the plant, though it's my understanding that even the best grafts only last a few years, as the base grows faster than the Gymnocalycium. After that point, the difference in speed between the two becomes too great for the graft to hold together, and the two split apart. Some of the sites I ran across in researching this one seemed to be suggesting that the Gymnocalycium, if removed from the base and replanted, will remain colored until it dies from lack of food; other sites implied that severed grafts would spontaneously begin to produce chlorophyll even though they never had previously, and could be planted on their own. My personal suspicion is that both are true: the "purple" grafts, if you look closely, do contain some green, towards the center of the plant:



So they probably could begin making food for themselves if they really needed to. Peanut butter sandwiches, at least. At the same time, the neon yellow and orange and pink give no indication of having any green pigment in them whatsoever, and so I would guess that those probably couldn't make it on their own. We do have a few plain green Gymnocalycium at work, but they don't do anything terribly interesting and just look like your ordinary small green beanbag-shaped cactus. A couple of them do color up a little in the summer: they stay green but have a red / purple cast to them, especially on the most exposed portions of the plants. It's not especially attractive: mostly they just look kind of burnt.

But who cares about the Gymnocalyciums anyway, right? What we're really interested in is the base, the sad little, put-upon, servant of a plant that's doing all the heavy lifting.



The above is my own personal plant. I got it from Lowe's, after an excruciating wait to see whether anybody else was going to take it. It was one of a number of grafted cacti they had, all of them Gymnocalycium/Hylocereus types, but on this particular one, the graft had come off, and there were sprouts from each corner of the Hylocereus. I wanted to buy it, but the original plant was like $3.47, which seemed like a lot for a plant that was kinda, you know, broken. So I waited, and waited, and then finally there it was, waiting for me, on the half-price racks.

It's done well for me so far. It grew really quickly when it first arrived, and has settled down a little bit now that we're in the middle of winter. One of the bigger surprises was the sudden appearance of aerial roots from the center of the stem segments:



This is perfectly normal, just not something I was expecting to see. The aerial roots are like aerial roots on anything else: they're not mandatory. If you don't like them, you can cut them off; if they dry up and die, the plant isn't necessarily hurt any.

The thing I was most surprised about, though, was that when I started looking into it, I found out that this was the same plant that gives us the dragon fruit, or pitaya. As a bonus surprise, I found out that "dragon fruit" really existed: I'd actually assumed that there was probably no such thing. (Based on the name, it sounded like a marketing ploy to me, and it's not like I'd seen any in the grocery store.)2 But they are real, and they look like this:

Photo: Allen Timothy Chang, at the Wikipedia entry for pitaya


I think you'll agree that "dragon fruit" seems like an appropriate name. The interior of the fruit is full of small, crunchy black seeds, which are (I hear) pretty easily sprouted; the pulp surrounding the seeds is white, pink, or red, depending on its ancestry. It is apparently typical for the fruit to be served chilled, and the flesh scooped out of the rind with a spoon. The taste is said to be something like a melon or kiwi (the crunchy seeds contribute to the kiwi comparison): sweet, but not intense.

The flowers are also kind of a big deal:

Photo: "roychai," at the Wikipedia entry for pitaya


The flowers are short-lived, opening only for one night. They're pretty damned elaborate, as you can see from the picture, and are heavily scented. By all accounts, they're awesome flowers, but alas, I've never seen one of those in person either.

Plants have to be large, if not old, in order to set blooms and fruit. Mine clearly has a ways to go. They are supposed to grow faster and do better in general if you give them something to hang onto, like with Monstera deliciosa, though since they get big (20 feet is not unheard of), you're going to want to choose something you can add to over time. They will climb trees in the wild, though they're not picky, and will attach to burlap-covered poles, concrete walls, slow-moving pets, or whatever.3 At least a couple places I ran across on-line seemed to be suggesting that it's reasonable to expect blooms at about two years old and / or two feet tall; to get fruit you need somewhat bigger plants, and the flowers have to be pollinated. I haven't seen anybody address the question of whether plants are self-fertile.

Care is fairly typical cactus, though since this is a jungle species (the Hylocereus genus as a whole is native to the Caribbean and Central America south to the northmost part of South America), it's somewhat more flexible about certain things. Full sun is desirable indoors; the plant can be moved outside during the summer but should be shaded from the hottest summer sun, and obviously one will want to make any big shifts in light level somewhat gradually. The plant adapts to a pretty wide range of soils, and tolerates very hot and very cold conditions (up to 110ºF/43ºC, down to freezing or below, though they can only withstand short periods of cold, so don't push this too hard). Humidity is essentially a non-issue.

Propagation is said to be pretty simple: they root easily from cuttings that have been allowed to dry for a day or two: stand the cutting up on a well-draining soil and water when the soil gets dry, and the plant will handle the rest. It's also supposed to be a piece of cake to sprout seeds, if you're lucky enough to get a fruit to take seeds from: my understanding is that a moist but not soggy, fairly loose soil mix, seeds sprinkled around on top, and a plastic bag over the top of the mix is all you really need. Seedlings can be transplanted when they've grown beyond their seed leaves.

I'm a little clueless on watering; I've been going with the standard cactus approach of letting it get pretty dry between waterings, which with my plant winds up being about every 10-14 days. So far, so good, though I have seen a few things around the net that suggest that this needs to be cut back even further during the winter. So far, there are no complaints, so I'm inclined to keep doing what I've been doing. But we'll see how it goes.

I'm going to assume mealybugs can be a problem, because when the hell are they ever not, but I haven't had any yet.

They're known for getting kind of top-heavy. Wider, shallower pots are sometimes advised for this, to lower the center of gravity, but you still have to bear in mind that the roots only need as much soil as they need, and you can't move them into a pot that's larger than they need without there being some consequences.

I don't expect to get fruit from this plant. I don't even really expect flowers, to tell the truth. But I do like it, all the same, for being this totally cool plant that was hidden in plain sight: crazy flowers, alien-looking fruit, a tree-climbing cactus, and the only time I ever saw it, it was relegated to being the low-key servant for some lazy-ass Gymnocalycium that won't even make their own chlorophyll. Not that you should go to your local plant supplier and start liberating the Hylocereus by knocking off their grafts: that would be wrong, if amusing ("Grow, my pretties! Grow and be free!"). But, you know, sooner or later you'll see one where the graft has come off on its own, through normal handling or whatever,4 and depending on where you find yourself, you may be able to get it for a song, if you ask the right people. And it'd be worth getting.

-

Photo credits: fruit and flower as noted in text; all others are my own.
1 (Some or all of this post will also apply to the closely-related species Hylocereus trigonus. The differences between H. trigonus and H. undatus are small enough that I couldn't determine how anyone tells them apart. So feel free to pity H. trigonus as well, if you are so moved.)
2 (I can sometimes be too skeptical for my own good.)
3 There is considerable on-line disagreement about exactly how fast these grow, with some sides saying they're practically a blur and others saying that they take forever to get anywhere. Based on the speed of my own, thus far, and the information at this site, I lean towards blur, but your results may vary, especially if you and I actually own different species. Selenicereus spp. are similar-looking, and also have big Las-Vegas-showgirl flower production extravaganzas, but appear to work much more slowly. Also different Hylocereus species can, I think, reasonably be expected to grow at differing speeds. Anyone with actual information about this, even anecdotal, is encouraged to share in the comments.
4 Thus far, nothing like this has happened to the batch we got a couple weeks ago, for which I am grateful. They've actually even sold pretty well. I'm not a fan of grafted cacti, never have been, and I liked them even less well when I read that the graft isn't stable for more than a few years, so I was kind of against ordering them in the first place, but apparently the rest of the world likes the damn garish and fake things better than I do.